Husqvarna SM 610 2005 vs. Husqvarna SM 630 2011

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

Husqvarna SM 630 2011

Husqvarna SM 630 2011

Loading...

Technical Specifications Husqvarna SM 610 2005 compared to Husqvarna SM 630 2011

Husqvarna SM 610 2005
Husqvarna SM 630 2011

Motor i pogonski sustav

PrijenosPrijenosLanacPrijenosLanac
CilindriCilindri1Cilindri1
TaktTaktČetverotaktniTaktČetverotaktni
PomakPomak576 ccmPomak600 ccm

Dimenzije i težina

Međuosovinski razmakMeđuosovinski razmak1,500 mmMeđuosovinski razmak1,495 mm
Visina sjedalaVisina sjedala920 mmVisina sjedala910 mm
Težina s praznim spremnicima za tekućineTežina s praznim spremnicima za tekućine140 kgTežina s praznim spremnicima za tekućine142.5 kg
Kapacitet spremnika za gorivoKapacitet spremnika za gorivo12.5 l (nisko)Kapacitet spremnika za gorivo12 l (nisko)

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

The Husky is by no means an inexpensive entry-level bike. However, single-cylinder enthusiasts looking for power, a great chassis and civil service intervals have come to the right place with the Husky. A good iron!

Optimal chassis

independent geometry

linear steering feel

high-quality fork

qualitative workmanship.

Hakelige ignition lock seems to have been reworked cheaply

high price

not suitable for long-distance travel

spare parts supply problematic.

Husqvarna SM 630 2011

Husqvarna SM 630 2011

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH